<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AjaxQueue and jQuery 1.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:22:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-410</guid>
		<description>edit: 
at least for the &quot;queue&quot; mode it can be fixed if you change all calls of &quot;ajax.apply(this, arguments)&quot; to ajax.apply(settings.context, arguments)
The &quot;sync&quot; mode seems to be more work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>edit:<br />
at least for the &#8220;queue&#8221; mode it can be fixed if you change all calls of &#8220;ajax.apply(this, arguments)&#8221; to ajax.apply(settings.context, arguments)<br />
The &#8220;sync&#8221; mode seems to be more work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-409</guid>
		<description>There is a bug when using the &quot;context&quot; option from the original jQuery.ajax . In the callbacks the false &quot;this&quot; reference is set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a bug when using the &#8220;context&#8221; option from the original jQuery.ajax . In the callbacks the false &#8220;this&#8221; reference is set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You rock!</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>You rock!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-387</guid>
		<description>i had my crappy solution... but your code rocks! thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had my crappy solution&#8230; but your code rocks! thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agentphoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>agentphoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking high and low through all kinds of Ajax queuing stuff and this looks promising, but I have a page I&#039;m working on that can have up to 8 Ajax requests, but the user determines how many requests there are. Is there a way with something like this to know when the queue has finished running?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking high and low through all kinds of Ajax queuing stuff and this looks promising, but I have a page I&#8217;m working on that can have up to 8 Ajax requests, but the user determines how many requests there are. Is there a way with something like this to know when the queue has finished running?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-372</guid>
		<description>@mat. Happy to have sorted that for you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mat. Happy to have sorted that for you <img src='http://www.onemoretake.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat.</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>mat.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Forget it, it&#039;s work like a charm. My mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget it, it&#8217;s work like a charm. My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat.</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>mat.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

Nice work!

I use your solution on my local website, I use jQuery 1.4.2. There is a problem on your solution, the queue length can increase but never decrease, so it&#039;s work for all ajax request which are sent before the first request is completed otherwise it&#039;s blocked. It&#039;s due to the fact that you use the queue length to permut the &quot;ajaxRunning[port]&quot; variable. But the queue length doesn&#039;t reflact the number of request which are not yet sent but reflact the number of ajax request call.

Anyway to solve it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>Nice work!</p>
<p>I use your solution on my local website, I use jQuery 1.4.2. There is a problem on your solution, the queue length can increase but never decrease, so it&#8217;s work for all ajax request which are sent before the first request is completed otherwise it&#8217;s blocked. It&#8217;s due to the fact that you use the queue length to permut the &#8220;ajaxRunning[port]&#8221; variable. But the queue length doesn&#8217;t reflact the number of request which are not yet sent but reflact the number of ajax request call.</p>
<p>Anyway to solve it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Yes, thats exactly what it does. It also adds a &#039;port&#039; option, which allows you to group requests together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, thats exactly what it does. It also adds a &#8216;port&#8217; option, which allows you to group requests together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-366</guid>
		<description>So, do I understand correctly that this would add a new option &#039;mode&#039; to standard .ajax() calls, to which I should pass either &#039;abort&#039;, &#039;queue&#039; or &#039;sync&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do I understand correctly that this would add a new option &#8216;mode&#8217; to standard .ajax() calls, to which I should pass either &#8216;abort&#8217;, &#8216;queue&#8217; or &#8216;sync&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/10/11/ajaxqueue-and-jquery-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 21:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=291#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Thank you!  I was having the usual AJAX race condition related problems, and all I had to do was simply drop this in, and it fixed it (the autocomplete plugin we use, the &quot;Bassistance&quot; one, already takes advantage of AJAX queue).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  I was having the usual AJAX race condition related problems, and all I had to do was simply drop this in, and it fixed it (the autocomplete plugin we use, the &#8220;Bassistance&#8221; one, already takes advantage of AJAX queue).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
