<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery Inline Confirm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/03/02/jquery-inline-confirm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/03/02/jquery-inline-confirm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:50:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/03/02/jquery-inline-confirm/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=111#comment-237</guid>
		<description>put it on one example, i cant make work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put it on one example, i cant make work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenio</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/03/02/jquery-inline-confirm/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugenio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=111#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Although I agree with Edgar Friendly in the usability point I have to disagree with Bren. ASP.NET is not rigid, you should just know what to do with its server controls and what don&#039;t. Server side controls generate HTML for the web client. jQuery is a library for the client side, combining those two is the tricky thing, so if you want to do it you have to work with the ASP.NET produced output in the client side not with the server side control names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with Edgar Friendly in the usability point I have to disagree with Bren. ASP.NET is not rigid, you should just know what to do with its server controls and what don&#8217;t. Server side controls generate HTML for the web client. jQuery is a library for the client side, combining those two is the tricky thing, so if you want to do it you have to work with the ASP.NET produced output in the client side not with the server side control names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgar Friendly</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/03/02/jquery-inline-confirm/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgar Friendly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=111#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Confirmation is usually the wrong way to handle this kind of user interaction - Undo is really what people need.  I admit that this is a nice way to do confirmation, but just like UAC, people will quickly learn to ignore the Yes/No and just click yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confirmation is usually the wrong way to handle this kind of user interaction &#8211; Undo is really what people need.  I admit that this is a nice way to do confirmation, but just like UAC, people will quickly learn to ignore the Yes/No and just click yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bren</title>
		<link>http://www.onemoretake.com/2009/03/02/jquery-inline-confirm/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Bren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemoretake.com/?p=111#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Wow I have no idea that ASP.NET was so rigid... I think i&#039;ll stick with Django.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I have no idea that ASP.NET was so rigid&#8230; I think i&#8217;ll stick with Django.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
